|
| |
The Influence of the Old Testament
According to a majority of scholars, the synoptic problem - the strong
similarities between three of the gospels, is most accurately resolved by the
two-source hypothesis, according to which most of the content of Matthew and
Luke were copied wholesale from the Gospel of Mark and a lost collection of
quotations known as the Q document, with which the Gospel of Thomas is the most
similar document of the era. In the small amount of additional material unique
to Matthew, amongst the three, Jesus is presented in a way that has strong
parallels with significant Old Testament figures, most noticeably Moses, whose
birth narrative, and sojourn in the wilderness, Matthew appears to have used as
the basis of that of Jesus.
It is widely accepted that the Gospel accounts were influenced by the Old
Testament. In particular, many
quotations
attributed to the Q document, which the Gospels attribute to Jesus, find
parallels in several places of the Old Testament. Advocates of the Jesus Myth
believe that the gospels are not history but a type of midrash: creative
narratives based on the stories, prophecies, and quotes in the Hebrew Bible. In
particular, there is no reason to assume that the sayings attributed to Q, a
document theoretically devoid of narrative, originated with Jesus, rather than
just being a collection of wisdom from several independent sources, such as the
Old Testament. As such, advocates of the Jesus Myth theory claim that when the
midrashic elements are removed, little to no content remains that could be used
to demonstrate the existence of an historical Jesus .
Though conceding that the gospels may contain some creativity and midrash,
opponents of the Jesus Myth theory argue that the gospels are more akin to
ancient Graeco-Roman biographies. Although scholars do not agree on the exact
nature of this genre, associated works attempted to impart historical
information about historical figures, but were not comprehensive and could
include legendary developments. Nevertheless, as ancient biographies, proponents
of Jesus' existence believe they contain sufficient historical information to
establish his historicity.
Although there are many types of midrash, the Toledot Yeshu jumps out as being
the most similar to the proposal that characters and situations were invented
wholesale according to religious dogma and Old Testament prophecy. However,
opponents of the Jesus Myth theory have argued that the closest parallels to
potential Moses-based embellishment of the Jesus narrative, are inapplicable.
Moreover, there are many examples of ancient Jewish and Christian literature
that shaped their stories and accounts according to Old Testament influence, but
nevertheless provided some historical accounts ; for example, in 1 Maccabees,
Judas and his battles are described in terms which parallel those of Saul's and
David's battles against the Philistines in 1 and 2 Samuel, but nevertheless 1
Maccabees has a degree of respect amongst historians as having a reasonable
degree of historical reliability (John R. Bartlett, The First and Second Books
of Maccabees, p. 15-17).
Christian Mythology
| |
|